Archive

Archive for January, 2012

Router Logging Software – Free – MyRouter Log

January 31st, 2012 No comments

My router was crashing a bit and I thought I would check the router logs to see if there was any clues in there as to what was going on?

Once my router crashes the log files are lost, so I went in search of some router logging software.

In short I tried a few and they were buggy pieces of rubbish that didn’t work.

It’s just a simple UDP listening program, and so In the immortal words of Jeremy Clarkson (Top Gear, UK), “How hard could it be?”, so I wrote my own.

Its called “MyRouter Log” and it’s a UDP port listener for capturing to a text log file, the contents of your routers UDP broadcast.

Its free and full details can be found here on my site, MyRouter Log

Hope you like it and give me some feedback in case my software is a “buggy piece of rubbish” ;-)”

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Categories: Free Software Tags:

JetPack Post Statistics Link Plug-in

January 25th, 2012 No comments

You may have noticed that the jetpack plugin provides you with some great statistics on the hits to your website.

It also allows you to drill down on the statistics for each post, with one problem…

If your post does not appear in the top 10 results for the day then you have no way to see the statistics.

That is where the “JetPack Post Statistics Link Plug-in” comes in.

The plug-in provides an extra column on your Posts admin page and provides a link to the statistics for each post.

To download a copy go to my main website.. >> Download Link <<

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Categories: Free Software, WordPress Tags:

Crysis 2 50Hz issue ATI Card on HDMI connection

January 16th, 2012 2 comments

I have been running Crysis 2 on my DVI connection no worries, but recently I changed to a HDMI cable to connect my Benq E2420HD to my Msi R6850 video card.

If you see my previous post, Benq Monitor and HDMI not working you will see that I had some issues with getting my monitor to work, but I found the settings and all was good with the world.. until I launched Crysis 2.

Issue

When Crysis 2 runs with DX 11 in full screen mode, it runs @ 50Hz.

My monitor can handle 50Hz, (it is a supported refresh rate), but the game did not fill the full screen. The full screen was black but the edges of the game fell about 1cm short or the edge of my screen.

So WTF was going on?

Catalyst Control Centre.. again..

The issue is the overscan setting. As per the previous post (link above), I had to set the overscan setting to 0%. But when the monitor switches to 50Hz it also switches to a different profile, and this profile has the overscan setting to about the middle of this bar, (approx 7.5% underscan)

The solution is:

  1. Launch Catalyst control centre
  2. Expand “Desktop Management” and click on “Desktop Properties”
  3. Set the monitor to use 50Hz and click apply
    your monitor will switch and wow you suddenly see the black border similar to when you were playing Crysis 2
  4. Switch to the “Scaling Options” and set the Overscan to 0% and click apply

When you play Crysis it will now fill the full screen.

Got to go.. stuff to shoot .. ๐Ÿ˜‰

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 10.0/10 (4 votes cast)

Categories: Hardware Issues Tags:

Benq Monitor and HDMI not working – FIXED

January 14th, 2012 2 comments

Attaching a monitor to a pc via HDMI should be easy… right.

Well on hooking up a Benq E2420HD monitor to a MSi R6850 (PM2DIGD5), the image looked terrible.

It took a bit of tweaking but these are the steps you will need to follow to get things looking how they should.

Step 1. Catalyst Control Centre Settings

In my case the software was defaulting to set the scaling options to “under scaled”! (about -7.5%)

Turn the scaling off and set it to 0% as shown.

Step 2. Monitor Settings

You need to turn off the overscan feature, in the monitors OSD (on-screen display) settings.

  1. Go to the Picture Advanced page and choose display mode

    On Screen Display 1

  2. Set the Overscan feature to OFF
    On screen display overscan

    Problem solved ๐Ÿ™‚

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 10.0/10 (3 votes cast)

Categories: Hardware Issues Tags:

SATA 3 SSD running on SATA II benchmark

January 11th, 2012 35 comments

This benchmark and review is to show what performance differences you can expect when you try to run a SATA 3 SSD on older hardware that only supports SATA II (300 Mb/s) connections.

I was recently looking to purchase a SSD drive as an upgrade for my old socket 775 Core 2 Duo machine to keep it alive a bit longer. This meant purchasing a current SATA 3 drive and running it connected via the on-board SATA 2 connection.

When attempting to research whether I needed an add-on SATA 3 card I was unable to find any real world reviews of this type of upgrade, so this review is designed to fill this gap.


The Rig

Mother Board: Socket 775, Gigabyte EP45-DS3
CPU: Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0Ghz, running overclocked @ 4.0Ghz.
Memory: 4GB (2x2GB) Corsair CM2X2048-8500C5C (1066Mhz)
Video: MSi R6850 Storm II 1G OC (R6850 PM2DIGD5)
SSD: Corsair Force GT 120GB, (1.3.3 firmware on SATA II in AHCI mode)
ATA Drive: Segate Barracudaยฎ 7200.12 1 TB
OS: Windows 7 SP1 – 64 bit

SSD Benchmark

The SSD drive in question is a Corsair Force GT 120GB.

Full specs and details can be found here on guru3D

This is connected via the on board SATA II Connection.

The theoretical throughput is 300Mb/s. The following is the results of AS SSD.

The overall score is comparable with the results from the guru 3d review with the obvious difference being the Sequential Read maxing out at 263Mb/s.

Here is the compression benchmark, so clearly the drive is not being pushed very hard..

OS Benchmark

The machine is running Windows 7 – 64bit, plus all the services and software one would expect, including:

  • AVG Anitvirus
  • Catalyst control centre
  • HP Printer Software
  • Msi Afterburner
  • Core Temp
  • Network and All CPU meter gadgets

The Test

This benchmark recorded the total time to startup the PC on the 7200RPM 1TB drive vs the SSD. The benchmark recorded the time from when windows started loading after the POST screen, until a working desktop was available. This was identified as the time at which the Gadgets appeared on the desktop. This was split into 4 timing points:

  1. time to login screen
  2. time to login
  3. time to see the desktop
  4. time until the gadgets loaded.

The windows startup time is now 4 times faster with the SSD drive, launching to a working desktop in less than 25 seconds, (including typing my password!)

Windows Experience Score

The windows experience went from…

to..

The slowest component is now my CPU.. may have to tweak that overclock ๐Ÿ˜‰

Edit Caveat: Note you will have to factor in the fact that the SSD benchmark is on a clean install Windows 7 whilst the ATA Drive have been running for a while, but even so I have been using the SSD setup over the past few weeks since writing this review and start up is still very quick with only a few seconds between clicking login and being able to use the computer ๐Ÿ™‚

Crysis

I timed the loading of the application and the loading of a new game.
With the following results.

The load times were generally faster on the SSD drive and seem to have a larger performance gap as we moved from Crysis to Crysis 2.

Crysis Benchmarks

I ran both the Crysis and Crysis 2 benchmarks with no consistent pattern of improvement. The tests were within 2 fps of each other but in some cases the SSD was better and some worse. So it appears the Disk has no real impact on Crysis frame rates.

General Performance

The general performance of loading applications like Internet Explorer and Firefox, windows media centre was recorded. In most instances the load times on the SSD drive was around the 0.5 – 2.0 seconds, whilst load times on the hard drive were sometimes comparable but more often they were slower (Browsers took approx 4 seconds to load to Google homepage), but the hard drive was inconsistent in performance with load times as high as 14.5 seconds for IE being recorded.

PC Mark – Vantage (1.0.2.0)

To give some kind of industry benchmark for the entire PC experience I benchmarked the machine for overall performance using PC Mark, the results were

Hard Drive Score – 6313
SSD Score – 10683

This is a 70% improvement over the Hard drives score.

Conclusion

The general feal of the machine is much snappier with the SSD drive. Applications install really fast, open quickly and it is a nicer experience to use with no major delays when using the applications. Also I just realised my computer is also eerilly silent on start-up no more mechanical whirring and noises

I would say that it was worth the money even with just an old SATA II connection. Also this drive will be a useful addition to my Laptop at some point in the future ;-).

SATA 3 add-on Cards

The next stage of this benchmark test will be to get my hands on a SATA 3 card like the ASRock SATA 3 card or the ASUS U3S6 and see if these cards actually provide any performance benefit, stay tuned…

EDIT: 24-Feb-2012 – Asus U3S6 Review – Benchmark Sata 2 add on card >>>

EDIT- 15 march 2012

SATA 3 SSD with no AHCI?

Neville asked…

So here it is.

Synthetic benchmarks

On AS SSD I did 3 runs on with both AHCI on and AHCI off (IDE)

With AHCI on I got the following results:

  1. 158 / 209 – 449
  2. 158 / 173 – 413
  3. 158 / 184 – 422

The best result is here

AS SSD benchmark Corsair Force GT 120 GB in AHCI mode

Note: similar to the later tests I did on the ASUS U3S6 you notice the read performance score is solid but the write performance is quite variable.

With AHCI off I got the following results:

  1. 66/158 – 261
  2. 68/159 – 266
  3. 68/171 – 277

The best result is here:
AS SSD benchmark Corsair Force GT 120 GB in no AHCI (IDE) mode

So the synthetic performance result is about 40% slower with AHCI off!!
Notice also that the 4K-64Thrd really drags the read score down, whilst all other values are comparable

Here is what Crystal Mark recorded..

With ACHI on
CrystalDiskMark corsair Force GT SATA II SSD with AHCI on
With AHCI Off
CrystalDiskMark corsair Force GT SATA II SSD with AHCI off (IDE)

Note again most figures are comparable except 4KQD32.

I did some digging and found this post
What is 4KQD32 and it is described as “4k 32 queue depth. There are 32 requests in line for 4k of data”.
If you read further they suggested this is an un-realistic test for real world usage as the disk queue for windows 7 is between 1-3 normally, (all of which backs up my next statements ๐Ÿ˜‰ …)

Real world performance

But again these are only synthetic benchmark figures. What did this mean to the general performance of the PC?

  • Windows Experience I re-did the windows experience score and it was identical in all of the measures.
  • Windows Start Up I averaged around 22.5 seconds for the boot time using the same approach to measuring startup time.
  • General Feel The system seemed still quite fast to load apps and not dis-similar to running with AHCI on.
  • Crysis I re-ran the Crysis Benchmarks and found that the performance was within +/- 1 fps with AHCI on or off.

So if you look solely at the synthetic benchmark things don’t look so good, (AS SSD even says its BAD – checkout the screenshot) but in the real world you will notice a significant improvement in boot times, and general speed of your PC.

As an example I have a work laptop that is a Lenovo ThinkPad with a Centrino processor and it has always performed really well and I couldn’t work out why it was so good with such a small CPU in it. Only when I did some poking around when writing this post did I find it runs a 60GB SSD.. and it all started to make sense.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 10.0/10 (38 votes cast)

Categories: Hardware Review Tags: